Author summary
42%1 analyzed article/video401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bolarinwa Oladeji results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 976 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,284 of 8,898 authors). This Bolarinwa Oladeji is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Bolarinwa Oladeji
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
75%Bolarinwa Oladeji (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,604
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 10.2%10.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos