Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High School Athletes results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 2,145 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,536 of 16,562 topics). This High School Athletes is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
High School Athletes
Topic details
Total words: 2,980
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos