Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These High Profile Figures results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 1,509 hits. Analysis detected 7,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (3,015 of 16,562 topics). This High Profile Figures is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
High Profile Figures
Topic details
Total words: 4,740
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 31.8%31.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 8.1%8.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 11.4%11.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 5.1%5.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 31.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Horn Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.7%Straw Man: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos