Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Herschel Walker results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 1,018 hits. Analysis detected 4,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,129 topics). This Herschel Walker is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Herschel Walker
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.4%23.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos