Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heritage Foundation Staffing results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Genetic Fallacy, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 74.5% saturation with 1,099 hits. Analysis detected 4,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (641 of 16,562 topics). This Heritage Foundation Staffing is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Heritage Foundation Staffing
Topic details
Total words: 1,476
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510096.1% percentile
14.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 74.5%74.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 70.6%70.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 16.3%16.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 28.3%28.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.4%14.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.2%14.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Negativity Bias: Topic 74.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 70.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 15.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 3.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Personal Incredulity: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos