BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Pessimism Bias, and Genetic Fallacy, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 72.4% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 1,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 492 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 85.1% and a BS Rank of 91% (1,992 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the article peer group.

Today’s edition of quick hits. 
* A big loss for the White House: “Over dissent from Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, the Supreme Court declined to let the Trump administration immediately deploy the National Guard in Chicago, in the latest high court test of Donald Trump’s sweeping claims of authority in his second term.” 
* The latest revelations: “Donald Trump flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet at least eight times in the mid-1990s, according to an email the Justice Department released late Monday as part of its rolling disclosure of documents in its Epstein investigation. 
The email from Jan. 7, 2020, appears to refer to the related investigation into Epstein’s longtime companion Ghislaine Maxwell, now in prison for conspiring with Epstein to sexually abuse girls.” 
* The latest in a series of escalations: “The U.S. moved a large number of special-operations aircraft and multiple cargo planes filled with troops and equipment into the Caribbean area this week, giving the U.S. additional options for possible military action in the region, according to U.S. officials and open source flight-tracking data.” 
* I wonder if more people sought out the segment online than would’ve watched it on CBS in the first place: “While the furor over CBS News’ decision to delay a ‘60 Minutes’ report about deportees sent by the Trump administration to a notorious Salvadoran prison persisted Monday, the finished segment was already circulating online after streaming in Canada. 
The report, titled ‘Inside CECOT,’ appeared on a streaming app owned by Canada’s Global Television Network.” 
* The inevitable investigation: “The Department of Education said Monday that it would investigate whether Brown University violated the law by failing to provide proper campus safety before and immediately after a fatal shooting killed two students earlier this month.” 
* A lawsuit worth watching: “Twenty-one state and district attorneys general filed a lawsuit against Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought on Monday, opposing his moves to shutter the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.” 
* The last one out at Heritage should remember to turn off the lights: “More than a dozen staffers at The Heritage Foundation are leaving the conservative think tank to join a nonprofit led by former Vice President Mike Pence as the embattled organization continues to reel from ongoing turmoil.” 
* A story we’ve kept an eye on: “A federal judge’s decision has moved Donald Trump and his family a step closer to constructing his presidential library on a valuable plot of land in Miami that was controversially transferred to him by Florida Republicans.” 
* My best wishes to the former senator and his family: “Former Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb., announced Tuesday that he has been diagnosed with ‘metastasized, stage-four pancreatic cancer,’ writing in an X post that the diagnosis is ‘a death sentence.’” 
I’ll be away from the blog for the next few days, but I’ll see you again on Monday morning, Dec. 29. 
Happy Holidays to you and yours. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%Steve Benen: 1.6%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias14.4%This article: 8.3%Steve Benen: 3.7%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic8.3%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%Steve Benen: 10.5%MS NOW: 7.5%Confirmation Bias12.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 55.7%Steve Benen: 23.0%MS NOW: 15.4%Framing Effect55.7%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 4.7%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.9%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.9%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 4.4%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 3.4%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 72.4%Steve Benen: 29.0%MS NOW: 19.2%Negativity Bias72.4%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.3%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 3.2%MS NOW: 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.0%Steve Benen: 3.1%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias12.0%This article: 29.1%Steve Benen: 3.1%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias29.1%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 2.9%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.9%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 2.1%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 7.8%MS NOW: 4.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 17.3%Steve Benen: 1.9%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.3%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 2.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 6.3%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 11.3%MS NOW: 9.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.2%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.1%Steve Benen: 3.5%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question8.1%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.4%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.6%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 23.4%Steve Benen: 2.2%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy23.4%This article: 22.2%Steve Benen: 8.9%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization22.2%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.5%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 12.0%Steve Benen: 3.3%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.7%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 10.2%Steve Benen: 1.7%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope10.2%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.6%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%

492 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.