Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Guard Chicago results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Genetic Fallacy , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 74.5% saturation with 1,099 hits . Analysis detected 4,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of 98% (919 of 37,536 keywords). This National Guard Chicago is worse (more manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group. National Guard Chicago
Keyword details
Total words: 1,476
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.6% percentile 14.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 74.5% 74.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 70.6% 70.6% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 28.3% 28.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Negativity Bias: Keyword 74.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 70.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 15.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 3.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst