Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (cfpb) results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Genetic Fallacy, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 74.5% saturation with 1,099 hits. Analysis detected 4,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (639 of 16,562 topics). This Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (cfpb) is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (cfpb)
Topic details
Total words: 1,476
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510096.1% percentile
14.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 74.5%74.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 70.6%70.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 16.3%16.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 15.8%15.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 28.3%28.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.4%14.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 15.2%15.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.2%14.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Negativity Bias: Topic 74.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 70.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 15.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 3.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Personal Incredulity: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos