Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heritage Foundation results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 57.1% saturation with 524 hits. Analysis detected 3,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 918 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (687 of 16,516 topics). This Heritage Foundation is worse (more manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
Heritage Foundation
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠96%Heritage Foundation (selected)14%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 918
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

96% percentile
025507510095.8% percentile
13.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles918 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 57.1%57.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 35.2%35.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 42.4%42.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 20.6%20.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 30.1%30.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 12.8%12.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 14.6%14.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 57.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 42.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 35.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 14.6%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos