Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie Sykes results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 57.1% saturation with 524 hits. Analysis detected 3,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 918 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (199 of 6,628 authors). This Charlie Sykes is worse (more manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
Charlie Sykes
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠97%Charlie Sykes (selected)14%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 918
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

97% percentile
025507510097.0% percentile
13.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles918 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 57.1%57.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 35.2%35.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 42.4%42.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 20.6%20.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 30.1%30.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 14.7%14.7%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Author 12.8%12.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 14.6%14.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 11.6%11.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Author 57.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 42.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 35.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 30.1%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 20.6%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 15.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Author 14.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 14.6%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Author 12.8%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 11.6%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Author 8.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos