Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heritage Americanism results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Negativity Bias, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 51.6% saturation with 830 hits. Analysis detected 4,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,266 of 16,562 topics). This Heritage Americanism is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Heritage Americanism
Topic details
Total words: 1,608
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.3% percentile
7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 33.0%33.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 28.7%28.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 51.6%51.6%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Topic 12.7%12.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.9%28.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 51.6%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 33.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 28.7%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 15.9%No True Scotsman: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 0.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos