Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hemp Regulation results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 1,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (13,992 of 16,562 topics). This Hemp Regulation is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Hemp Regulation
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,484
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos