Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heat Stroke results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 903 hits. Analysis detected 4,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,004 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,843 of 16,562 topics). This Heat Stroke is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Heat Stroke
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,004
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos