Topic summary
⁠61%2 analyzed articles/videos1,998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heat Pumps results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 1,380 hits. Analysis detected 7,830 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,008 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,537 of 16,562 topics). This Heat Pumps is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Heat Pumps
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.7%19.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos