Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,788 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Healthcare Technology results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,007 hits. Analysis detected 7,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,152 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (13,357 of 15,329 topics). This Healthcare Technology is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Healthcare Technology
Topic details
Total words: 11,152
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

13% percentile
025507510012.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos