Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Healthcare Systems results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 699 hits. Analysis detected 3,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,932 of 16,562 topics). This Healthcare Systems is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Healthcare Systems
Topic details
Total words: 5,304
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos