Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephanie Dubois results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 699 hits . Analysis detected 3,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,865 of 6,628 authors). This Stephanie Dubois is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group. Stephanie Dubois
Author details
Total words: 5,304
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst