Topic summary
⁠16%2 analyzed articles/videos1,428 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Misinformation results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Bandwagon, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 498 hits. Analysis detected 4,322 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,427 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (15,572 of 16,562 topics). This Health Misinformation is better (less manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group.
Health Misinformation
Topic details
Total words: 8,427
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751006.0% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos