Topic summary
⁠70%2 analyzed articles/videos1,292 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Issues results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 870 hits. Analysis detected 3,704 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,330 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,037 of 16,562 topics). This Health Issues is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Health Issues
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,330
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos