Topic summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video939 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Interactions results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Availability Heuristic, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 570 hits. Analysis detected 2,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,685 of 16,562 topics). This Health Interactions is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Health Interactions
Topic details
Total words: 3,756
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos