Some ingredients in nonalcoholic 'social tonics' can interact with medications or health conditions 38%

By Grace Abels11%

7/14/2026, 12:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 1,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 939 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (13,574 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the article peer group.

Have you ever picked up a cocktail, soda or sparkling water only to later realize it contained ingredients you’d never heard of that are supposed to help you relax, sleep or feel a "buzz?" 
It’s happened to me, too. 
What I thought was a lemon-blackberry cocktail was actually a nonalcoholic "social tonic" that came with a disclaimer (in small print on the back of the can) to talk to a medical professional before drinking it if you had a health condition or were taking any medication. 
This new class of nonalcoholic drinks goes by many names  "social tonics," "functional drinks," "adaptogenic drinks," "mood drinks" and "nootropic beverages," to name a few  and frequently advertises calming or cognition-boosting effects. 
Although they are often sold alongside soft drinks and beers, these drinks contain herbs, mushrooms and other supplements that your body can react to, similar to what can happen with medications. 
Some of the drinks’ most common ingredients are mild and unlikely to be harmful in the small doses contained in a single drink. 
But others could interact dangerously with medications or existing health conditions. 
Some can even impair you from driving a vehicle or put you at risk for acute liver failure. 
It’s hard to know the level of risk some of these added ingredient pose for a few reasons. 
First, unlike a supplement you might buy at the pharmacy, the doses of each herb or supplement are rarely listed on the container. 
You can get a sense of how much is in it by where it’s listed on the ingredient list, but that’s an imperfect system. 
For example, if it’s the first item listed, then that’s the most prevalent ingredient. 
Second, even if they were listed, many of these herbal supplements are not well studied in humans, so we don’t know what is considered a "safe" or recommended dose. 
Third, because of how herbal supplements are regulated in the U.S., research has shown that the dosing and quality can vary widely. 
The dose listed on the label doesn’t always match what’s actually in the product. 
So while it might seem unnecessary to do so before drinking a soda, for these types of drinks, you should consider consulting your doctor before consuming them  especially if you take medication, have a health condition or are breastfeeding or pregnant. 
Ingredients that can interact with antidepressants or other serotonin-boosting medications 
If you have anxiety or depression, a drink that advertises stress-relief and mood-boosting benefits may sound appealing. 
A few ingredients  kanna (also known as Sceletium), L-tryptophan and 5-HTP  are commonly added to these drinks for their serotonin-boosting properties. 
But if you are already taking a medication such as an antidepressant (SSRIs, SNRIs, SARIs, tricyclics or MAOIs) that increases your serotonin, consuming one of these supplements could put you at risk of serotonin syndrome  where your body gets too much of the neurotransmitter. 
It requires emergency medical care and can be life-threatening. 
If you are taking one of those medications, it might be best to avoid drinks containing the ingredients kanna, L-tryptophan and 5-HTP. 
Be careful if you take sedative medication 
Many of these drinks include herbs that help your body relax, but if you are already taking a sedative medication such as benzodiazepines, barbiturates or sleeping pills, the effects can compound in a dangerous way. 
Lemon balm, L-theanine, ashwagandha, L-tryptophan, passionflower and kava are a few of the common ingredients that could negatively interact with a sedative. 
Kava in particular may impair driving if consumed in large amounts. 
It’s also inadvisable to combine these drinks with alcohol, which also depresses your central nervous system. 
Ingredients that affect blood pressure, blood sugar or blood clotting 
Other ingredients, including damiana, L-theanine, ashwagandha, passionflower, reishi mushroom and rhodiola rosea, can affect your blood pressure and blood sugar or make it harder for blood to clot. 
(Blood clotting prevents excessive bleeding.) 
If you are already taking blood thinners, have an upcoming surgery, have diabetes or are taking blood pressure medications, you may want to avoid these ingredients. 
Ashwagandha, kava, and reishi mushrooms have been linked to rare cases of liver injury 
Even if a supplement is natural, your body processes it similarly to medications  through your liver. 
According to the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network, a federally-funded research group, around 20% of drug-induced liver injury cases are caused by dietary or herbal supplements. 
Ashwagandha, kava, reishi, green tea extract and turmeric have all been linked to rare cases of acute liver toxicity, which can be dangerous. 
Sometimes, cases are dose-dependent. 
Variables such as preexisting liver health problems, dose, frequency of consumption, other liver-toxic medications and alcohol consumption all can factor into your risk of liver toxicity. 
"A single drink would generally be expected to be of significantly lower concern than regular and extended duration consumption," said Dr. 
Joseph Lim, a hepatologist at Yale University. 
Other side effects are possible 
Other herbs can have random effects: Lemon balm may reduce thyroid activity whereas ashwagandha might increase it; lion’s mane mushroom might trigger a mushroom or mold allergy and passionflower may induce uterine contractions during pregnancy. 
That’s why it’s smart to do research and consult a doctor before incorporating these drinks into your routine. 
"I think the consumer just needs to be kind of aware that these …could cause serious issues, and just because they are kind of marketed as being healthy or whatever, that doesn't make that true," said Dr. 
Shan Yin, a doctor and toxicologist on the board of directors for the American College of Medical Toxicology. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 1.9%Grace Abels: 1.1%@politifact: 2.0%Confirmation Bias1.9%This article: 2.4%Grace Abels: 0.2%@politifact: 0.6%Anchoring Bias2.4%This article: 8.8%Grace Abels: 2.6%@politifact: 2.5%Availability Heuristic8.8%This article: 3.3%Grace Abels: 0.5%@politifact: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.5%@politifact: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.4%@politifact: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Grace Abels: 2.7%@politifact: 3.5%Framing Effect13.1%This article: 9.6%Grace Abels: 0.7%@politifact: 0.3%Loss Aversion9.6%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.3%@politifact: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.8%Grace Abels: 0.5%@politifact: 0.8%Optimism Bias1.8%This article: 6.1%Grace Abels: 0.9%@politifact: 1.1%Pessimism Bias6.1%This article: 38.1%Grace Abels: 6.3%@politifact: 5.1%Negativity Bias38.1%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.1%@politifact: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Grace Abels: 0.2%@politifact: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error2.8%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.9%@politifact: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.2%@politifact: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.1%@politifact: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.1%@politifact: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.3%@politifact: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.7%Grace Abels: 3.2%@politifact: 4.7%Appeal to Authority11.7%This article: 4.8%Grace Abels: 0.5%@politifact: 0.8%False Dilemma4.8%This article: 3.7%Grace Abels: 0.7%@politifact: 0.6%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.2%Grace Abels: 0.9%@politifact: 3.0%Hasty Generalization2.2%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.1%@politifact: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.0%Grace Abels: 1.6%@politifact: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion1.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.1%@politifact: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 1.3%@politifact: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.9%Grace Abels: 0.1%@politifact: 0.6%Burden of Proof1.9%This article: 3.5%Grace Abels: 0.8%@politifact: 0.2%Appeal to Nature3.5%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.2%@politifact: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.2%Grace Abels: 1.2%@politifact: 1.0%Anecdotal9.2%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.4%Grace Abels: 0.6%@politifact: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.4%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.2%@politifact: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.1%@politifact: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.2%Grace Abels: 0.8%@politifact: 1.7%Unattributed Quote6.2%This article: 6.2%Grace Abels: 1.7%@politifact: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection6.2%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.5%@politifact: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 11.5%Grace Abels: 4.3%@politifact: 1.0%Indoctrination11.5%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Grace Abels: 0.0%@politifact: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

939 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers5.4%attributed speech888writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 47 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDrug Induced Liver Injury Network • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageJoseph Lim • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageShan Yin • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words51% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Indoctrination-12.2 ptsWriter: 12.2%Drug Induced Liver Injury Network: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Drug Induced Liver Injury Network: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Drug Induced Liver Injury Network: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.