Topic summary
⁠62%2 analyzed articles/videos1,089 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Insurance Mandates results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 720 hits. Analysis detected 5,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,084 of 16,562 topics). This Health Insurance Mandates is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Health Insurance Mandates
Topic details
Total words: 4,140
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.4%17.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.7%9.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos