Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Initiatives results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 998 hits. Analysis detected 7,483 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,846 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (6,858 of 15,478 topics). This Health Initiatives is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Health Initiatives
Topic details
Total words: 5,846
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos