Topic summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video1,340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Disparities results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 389 hits. Analysis detected 2,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (9,933 of 15,769 topics). This Health Disparities is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Health Disparities
Topic details
Total words: 4,020
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos