Topic summary
⁠93%3 analyzed articles/videos349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Care Costs results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.4% saturation with 421 hits. Analysis detected 2,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,224 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,425 of 16,562 topics). This Health Care Costs is worse (more manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
Health Care Costs
Topic details
Total words: 1,224
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.4% percentile
6.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 34.4%34.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.0%14.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 17.0%17.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 13.1%13.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 27.6%27.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.6%6.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 34.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 27.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos