Topic summary
16%2 analyzed articles/videos2,505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Awareness results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,551 hits. Analysis detected 5,823 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,373 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (13,061 of 16,562 topics). This Health Awareness is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Health Awareness
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,373
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate