Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health Apps results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 323 hits . Analysis detected 1,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,731 of 16,562 topics). This Health Apps is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Health Apps
Topic details
Total words: 1,876
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst