Topic summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Health And Safety results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 1,687 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,257 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,743 of 16,562 topics). This Health And Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Health And Safety
Topic details
Total words: 1,257
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

83% percentile
025507510083.4% percentile
6.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 21.6%21.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 19.3%19.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.6%13.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos