Topic summary
⁠1%1 analyzed article/video153 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hazmat results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 47 faulty-reasoning hits from 459 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,899 of 16,559 topics). This Hazmat is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.
Hazmat
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 459
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles459 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos