Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Hate Groups results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 611 hits. Analysis detected 3,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,548 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Hate Groups is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hate Groups
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,548
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos