Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,876 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harvey Weinstein results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 789 hits. Analysis detected 6,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,504 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,010 of 16,562 topics). This Harvey Weinstein is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Harvey Weinstein
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,504
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos