Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harry Kane results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 537 hits. Analysis detected 2,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,462 of 16,562 topics). This Harry Kane is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Harry Kane
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,352
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.9% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos