Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harbor Area Peace Patrol results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , In-Group Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 519 hits . Analysis detected 3,675 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,998 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 76% (4,121 of 16,562 topics). This Harbor Area Peace Patrol is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group. Harbor Area Peace Patrol
Topic details
Total words: 2,998
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.1% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.1% Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Special Pleading: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst