Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hantavirus Ship Cape Verde Mv Hondius Footage results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 1,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (13,409 of 16,562 topics). This Hantavirus Ship Cape Verde Mv Hondius Footage is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Hantavirus Ship Cape Verde Mv Hondius Footage
Topic details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

19% percentile
025507510019.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos