Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ANNIE RISEMBERG results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 297 hits . Analysis detected 1,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,663 of 6,275 authors). This ANNIE RISEMBERG is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group. ANNIE RISEMBERG
Author details
Total words: 3,720
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Special Pleading: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst