Topic summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video916 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hamas Disarmament results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 1,246 hits. Analysis detected 5,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (4,989 of 23,194 topics). This Hamas Disarmament is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Hamas Disarmament
Topic details
Total words: 3,664
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.5% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 34.0%34.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.4%20.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.2%14.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 34.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos