Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 854 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hall Of Fame results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 685 hits . Analysis detected 3,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 47% (8,279 of 15,400 topics). This Hall Of Fame is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. Hall Of Fame
Topic details
Total words: 3,416
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 20.1% 20.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 14.6% 14.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst