Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gut Health results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 384 hits. Analysis detected 2,893 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,848 of 16,562 topics). This Gut Health is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Gut Health
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510064.7% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.7%12.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 9.8%9.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.7%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos