Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Guo Wengui results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 595 hits. Analysis detected 2,717 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (9,047 of 16,562 topics). This Guo Wengui is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Guo Wengui
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,080
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 18.3%18.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.2%3.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos