Topic summary
⁠28%2 analyzed articles/videos1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gunfire results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Halo Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 476 hits. Analysis detected 2,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,906 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,911 of 16,562 topics). This Gunfire is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Gunfire
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,906
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.2% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos