Topic summary
87%3 analyzed articles/videos1,044 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gubernatorial Races results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 653 hits. Analysis detected 4,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,936 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 59% (9,717 of 23,184 topics). This Gubernatorial Races is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Gubernatorial Races
Topic details
Total words: 4,936
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

58% percentile
025507510058.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.6%5.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate