Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Guadalupe Centers results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, In-Group Bias, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 1,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,993 of 16,562 topics). This Guadalupe Centers is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Guadalupe Centers
Topic details
Total words: 3,552
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos