Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grocery Affordability results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Horn Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.7% saturation with 697 hits. Analysis detected 4,704 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,070 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (2,216 of 16,562 topics). This Grocery Affordability is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Grocery Affordability
Topic details
Total words: 2,070
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510086.6% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 23.9%23.9%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 21.8%21.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 33.3%33.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 14.2%14.2%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 9.7%9.7%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 9.4%9.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.7%33.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 33.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 23.9%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 21.8%, sitewide 1.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Red Herring: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 0.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.6%Special Pleading: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos