Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Grizzly Bear Recovery results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.5% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 423 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 20,842 topics). This Grizzly Bear Recovery is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Grizzly Bear Recovery
Topic details
Total words: 4,196
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos