Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grindr Ceo results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Self-Serving Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 152 hits. Analysis detected 1,047 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,161 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,032 of 16,562 topics). This Grindr Ceo is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Grindr Ceo
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,161
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.6% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.1%13.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.6%7.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.6%8.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos