Conservative CEO of gay dating app Grindr makes pick for California governor 61%

By Ross O'Keefe0%

4/18/2026, 3:29:08 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 443 faulty-reasoning hits from 387 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 56.9% and a BS Rank of 61% (8,550 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the article peer group.

The chief executive of gay dating app Grindr, who once-described himself as a conservative, has made his choice in the California governor’s race. 
Grindr CEO George Arison has endorsed moderate San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, and has cut a check for $7,000 to his campaign. 
“I’m supporting Matt Mahan,” he told Politico. 
Mahan is one of several Democrats in a wide-open 2026 field also featuring former Rep. 
Katie Porter and billionaire Tom Steyer. 
Steve Hilton is the lead Republican with Riverside Sheriff Chad Bianco an alternative option. 
He also noted that he doesn’t get involved in politics and doesn’t want his company involved either. 
“In general, I don’t get involved in politics. 
I don’t want Grindr involved in politics at all.” 
Arison stirred controversy in 2022 when he was named CEO of Grinder and tweets resurfaced where the CEO described himself as conservative. 
Those comments have since been deleted. 
It’s unclear if Arison is still conservative. 
But he doesn’t like how California is being run, suggesting the state should have a smaller government or more services. 
“I like living here for professional reasons. 
I like living here for the environment,” Arison said. 
“But I hate living here for the fact that we have a state government that is quite bigger than the one a decade ago that provides less services.” 
Grindr maintains a public policy team, he says, though they focus on users’ needs. 
“Most of what that team does is focus on things that our users need, rather than company needs. 
Like ensuring that HIV preventative and treatment funding continues to be available, decriminalization of being gay around the world, protecting gay marriage whenever necessary. 
I do get involved in that work a lot, and I do sometimes give money to campaigns when it makes sense, but very seldom,” he said. 
He told Politico that the company plans to heavily-utilize artificial intelligence and that he approves of the Trump administration‘s use of it. 
“I actually think that the strategy the [Trump] administration came up with is pretty good. 
It should be to unleash the potential of AI as much as possible, [making it] as accessible and as advanced as it can be. 
And ensure that we beat China and other evil countries,” he said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 3.7%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 1.5%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 3.4%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.9%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 1.5%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Ross O'Keefe: 1.3%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 11.8%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.4%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.5%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Ross O'Keefe: 1.8%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias6.2%This article: 5.2%Ross O'Keefe: 0.7%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias5.2%This article: 17.6%Ross O'Keefe: 15.0%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias17.6%This article: 11.4%Ross O'Keefe: 2.3%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias11.4%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 2.0%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Ross O'Keefe: 2.4%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias9.6%This article: 3.1%Ross O'Keefe: 0.9%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.1%This article: 9.0%Ross O'Keefe: 4.3%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect9.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.3%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 1.4%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.5%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Ross O'Keefe: 1.3%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem3.1%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.4%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 5.2%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.2%Ross O'Keefe: 1.6%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma5.2%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.4%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.9%Ross O'Keefe: 4.3%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization10.9%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.9%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 1.3%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 10.4%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 1.1%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 3.1%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 1.1%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.4%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 2.8%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.8%Ross O'Keefe: 3.4%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.8%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.1%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.2%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 4.6%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 2.4%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 14.7%Ross O'Keefe: 11.0%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice14.7%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.6%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 0.2%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.6%Ross O'Keefe: 1.9%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Ross O'Keefe: 1.4%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

387 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker48%attributed speech200writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 8 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 7 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 9 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 18 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 24 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 15 words • 100.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 24 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Arison • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

George Arison

66%flagged-word coverage
187 attributed words100% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-28.5 ptsWriter: 28.5%George Arison: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -3.0 ptsWriter: 11.0%George Arison: 8.0%8.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.