Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grindr results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Self-Serving Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 152 hits . Analysis detected 1,047 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,161 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,375 of 37,536 keywords). This Grindr is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Grindr
Keyword details
Total words: 1,161
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.0% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst