Topic summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video1,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Green Card Application Process results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 2,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,273 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,923 of 16,562 topics). This Green Card Application Process is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Green Card Application Process
Topic details
Total words: 3,273
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos