Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great White Shark results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 406 faulty-reasoning hits from 564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,596 of 16,562 topics). This Great White Shark is worse (more manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group.
Great White Shark
Topic details
Total words: 564
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.3% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles564 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.5%11.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.0%5.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos