Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,568 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Great Replacement Theory results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,706 hits. Analysis detected 11,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,912 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,325 of 16,562 topics). This Great Replacement Theory is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Great Replacement Theory
Topic details
Total words: 11,912
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.3%14.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos